Given GTA's track record, it will probably be fantastic, but after playing Saints Row The Third, I don't know if I can go back to a super serious open world game. I wish Rockstar would have either done a spin off or waited until the next set of consoles for this game.
yeah, i will buy this and probably enjoy it, but until there is some next gen consoles come around i can't really see myself getting a rock hard boner for anything. spoiled i guess.
Sushilove said:why isn't it called GTA San Andreas II?
Its probably not called GTA San Andreas II, because GTA IV, wasnt called GTA 3 II
I'd always believe that the GTA series were suposed to happen in Liberty City... GTA, GTA II, GTA III... when they did Vice city and San Andreas they weren't called GTA IV and V for that reason. GTA IV was in Liberty City again... using that logic, this one is set up in a fake-california again, so it shouldn't be GTA V...
Sushilove said:why isn't it called GTA San Andreas II?
Its probably not called GTA San Andreas II, because GTA IV, wasnt called GTA 3 II
I'd always believe that the GTA series were suposed to happen in Liberty City... GTA, GTA II, GTA III... when they did Vice city and San Andreas they weren't called GTA IV and V for that reason. GTA IV was in Liberty City again... using that logic, this one is set up in a fake-california again, so it shouldn't be GTA V...
Thats you're logic, not Rockstar's. To most people, it seemed that they would do one numbered game each console generation, but thats obviously not the case. I'm willing to bet that calling the game GTAV was purely a business/marketing decision. They probably did the research to find out that a numbered game would sell better than a non-numbered game.
21 Comments
Jake DL said about 1 year ago
EricAbstruse said about 1 year ago
8-bit ZOMBIE said about 1 year ago
To get the money to buy this game? If so, I see a fatal flaw in your plan.
Tony A said about 1 year ago
Andrew Haines said about 1 year ago
hahaha.
It looks pretty cool, I like how they updated the graphics a ton yet still made it look like GTA. A fake "L.A." should be pretty neat compared to NY
William Henry said about 1 year ago
augie said about 1 year ago
Skull With Hair said about 1 year ago
Sushilove said about 1 year ago
MattyVF said about 1 year ago
dobi said about 1 year ago
MattyVF said about 1 year ago
100% backed.
Who is Ryan C. said about 1 year ago
Instead, I supplemented my time to listening to Britney. And look how I turned out: Free of flaws
Setup85 said about 1 year ago
jumpy said about 1 year ago
it'd be great if they let you play as Britney in GTA
Who is Ryan C. said about 1 year ago
Acid said about 1 year ago
Its probably not called GTA San Andreas II, because GTA IV, wasnt called GTA 3 II
RobotTiger said about 1 year ago
god damn i just loled so hard
Sushilove said about 1 year ago
I'd always believe that the GTA series were suposed to happen in Liberty City... GTA, GTA II, GTA III... when they did Vice city and San Andreas they weren't called GTA IV and V for that reason.
GTA IV was in Liberty City again...
using that logic, this one is set up in a fake-california again, so it shouldn't be GTA V...
Acid said about 1 year ago
William Henry said about 1 year ago
Thats you're logic, not Rockstar's. To most people, it seemed that they would do one numbered game each console generation, but thats obviously not the case. I'm willing to bet that calling the game GTAV was purely a business/marketing decision. They probably did the research to find out that a numbered game would sell better than a non-numbered game.