Add Comment Watch Thread
... because Peanut Butter isn't alive!



I don't care if you believe or not, but this is hilarious.

  • dobi said about 1 year ago

    while we are on the subject of nutjobs...

  •

    Craig Robson said about 1 year ago

    yay one of these threads! timely too!

    in 274ad christianity, a widely accepted cult offshoot of Judaism was accepted as the state religion of Rome. 60 years later jesus' proposed birthdate was changed to overshadow the pagan winter solstice festival.

    merry "christ mass"

  • 110specialblack said about 1 year ago

  • Jandro said about 1 year ago

    the arguments i have for these videos just flooded my brain and melted it.

  • rich.a said about 1 year ago

    christian mythology , its just a matter of time

  • Tony A said about 1 year ago



    It almost killed me.

  • RustyEight said about 1 year ago

    Well to be fair, bananas are perfect

  • Craig Robson said about 1 year ago

    Tony A said:

    It almost killed me.

    i know you're all not dumb, i just like doing this.

    wild bannana:

    we actually used evolution (micro anyway) to make those fuckers more like they look now.

  • TRIBE said about 1 year ago

    dobi said:while we are on the subject of nutjobs...


    Seriously! I saw this shit yesterday and was blown away by the ignorance spewing from his mouth.

  • Serji Gold said about 1 year ago

    Micro evolution exists, and we have seen it happen over and over again. (E.g. Different breeds of Dogs, Horses, etc.)
    Macro on the other hand; we have never seen happen. A dog cannot become a none-dog over a long period of time.

  • Craig Robson said about 1 year ago

    Serji Gold said:Micro evolution exists, and we have seen it happen over and over again. (E.g. Different breeds of Dogs, Horses, etc.)
    Macro on the other hand; we have never seen happen. A dog cannot become a none-dog over a long period of time.

    fossil record mean anything to ya?

    read a fucking book before weighing in on evolution debates. evolution is a fact and one that is backed up by all facets of science. the only people opposing macro evolution are those with a religious agenda.

  • Craig Robson said about 1 year ago

    give this a read then use your brain to turn it into a memory. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

  • cityhall said about 1 year ago

    Tony A said:

    It almost killed me.

    From a filmdrunk commenter:
    “I’m going to PROVE to you that evolution is false by demonstrating how the human hand is perfectly formed to eat monkey food.”

  • 110specialblack said about 1 year ago

    Tony A said:

    It almost killed me.

    btw:

  •

    Craig Robson said about 1 year ago

    Craig Robson said:give this a read then use your mamalian brain to turn it into a memory. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
  •

    heat. said about 1 year ago

    "God, peanut butter and bananas / the story of life"

    That would be a great movie.

  • William Henry said about 1 year ago

    Serji Gold said:Micro evolution exists, and we have seen it happen over and over again. (E.g. Different breeds of Dogs, Horses, etc.)
    Macro on the other hand; we have never seen happen. A dog cannot become a none-dog over a long period of time.

    You clearly have no idea what you are talking about because anyone that understands evolution knows its a fact. Anyone that doesn't accept it as fact is either uninformed on the subject or has religious reasons for not accepting it. How many times does it have to be stated as a fact before people accept it? Its ridiculous that it is nearly 2012 and this debate is still happening.

  • RustyEight said about 1 year ago

    Peanut Butter doesn't create life = Evolution is false.
    Bananas are made for human hands = Creationism is real.

    Peanut Butter + Bananas = Delicious.

    Coincidence?

  • heat. said about 1 year ago

    I don't think so.

  • Craig Robson said about 1 year ago

    William Henry said:
    Serji Gold said:Micro evolution exists, and we have seen it happen over and over again. (E.g. Different breeds of Dogs, Horses, etc.)
    Macro on the other hand; we have never seen happen. A dog cannot become a none-dog over a long period of time.

    You clearly have no idea what you are talking about because anyone that understands evolution knows its a fact. Anyone that doesn't accept it as fact is either uninformed on the subject or has religious reasons for not accepting it. How many times does it have to be stated as a fact before people accept it? Its ridiculous that it is nearly 2012 and this debate is still happening.

    but but but but they call it a THEORY.

    gravity.

  • Perception Apparel said about 1 year ago

    This thread is gold i can't decide which video is the most ridiculous

  • Who is Ryan C. said about 1 year ago

    Thous shall not worship false idols, come into the light.....
  •

    MattyVF said about 1 year ago

    I love this thread.

  • Justin Layton said about 1 year ago

  • Who is Ryan C. said about 1 year ago

    MattyVF said:I love this thread.


  •

    alexpolicastro said about 1 year ago

    Both are theories and because you have to believe in one or the other, both are forms of a religion.

  • Chreck said about 1 year ago

    alexpolicastro said:Both are theories and because you have to believe in one or the other, both are forms of a religion.

    Sorry, but I think you have been misinformed on what the definition of a theory is.

  • Out There said about 1 year ago

    Perception Apparel said:This thread is gold i can't decide which video is the most ridiculous

    MattyVF said:I love this thread.
  •

    Tim said about 1 year ago

    110specialblack said:
    Tony A said:

    It almost killed me.

    btw:


    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha I'm crying

  • Craig Robson said about 1 year ago

    Chreck said:
    alexpolicastro said:Both are theories and because you have to believe in one or the other, both are forms of a religion.

    Sorry, but I think you have been misinformed on what the definition of a theory is.

    this is what people say when they dont understand the scientific form of the word theory.

    next you will be saying "science is a faith position"

    next time you want to say something is a theory i suggest you choose to exit your house via the upstairs window and not the front door, see if gravity is a theory or a fact.

  • JeffByNight said about 1 year ago

  • RustyEight said about 1 year ago

    Science = The formulation of explanations based off of observation and scientific process (hypothesis, theory, testing, results).

    Religion = A system of belief based off of faith raw faith with little or no underlying evidence.

  • Joshua Jordan said about 1 year ago

    Craig Robson said:
    Chreck said:
    alexpolicastro said:Both are theories and because you have to believe in one or the other, both are forms of a religion.

    Sorry, but I think you have been misinformed on what the definition of a theory is.

    this is what people say when they dont understand the scientific form of the word theory.

    next you will be saying "science is a faith position"

    next time you want to say something is a theory i suggest you choose to exit your house via the upstairs window and not the front door, see if gravity is a theory or a fact.

    Universal gravitation is actually a scientific law, not a theory ;)

  • Chreck said about 1 year ago

    Here we go:

    noun, plural the·o·ries.
    1.
    a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity. Synonyms: principle, law, doctrine.

    Check out those synonyms :)

  • Jake A said about 1 year ago

    Craig Robson said:
    Serji Gold said:Micro evolution exists, and we have seen it happen over and over again. (E.g. Different breeds of Dogs, Horses, etc.)
    Macro on the other hand; we have never seen happen. A dog cannot become a none-dog over a long period of time.

    fossil record mean anything to ya?

    read a fucking book before weighing in on evolution debates. evolution is a fact and one that is backed up by all facets of science. the only people opposing macro evolution are those with a religious agenda.

    evolution actually still in fact has yet been proven, largely in part due to all of the hoaxes that have plagued this field.

  • alexpolicastro said about 1 year ago

    "commonly regarded as correct" meaning most people might agree with it but its still a theory and not scientific law.

    "Science = The formulation of explanations based off of observation and scientific process (hypothesis, theory, testing, results)." Meaning its still at the theory stage.

    I'm just saying you still have to believe in it. Not saying its wrong or right just saying it is still only a theory. (Not trying to start a ruckus)

  • Jake A said about 1 year ago

    Im a Christian. who wants to pull the trigger here?!

  • DanielAndHisArt said about 1 year ago

    Jake A said:Im a Christian
  •

    Paul Granese said about 1 year ago

  • Jake A said about 1 year ago

    oops and i like rick perry too. and herman cain. and bachmann. and santorum. uh oh

Sign Up

Forgot Your Password?